|
Post by Hugh Jackman on Sept 3, 2014 14:00:22 GMT -5
Looks like no staff has come to our aid. What do we do? Call it a draw, open another thread and start afresh? What do you say?
|
|
|
Post by Hugh Jackman on Sept 7, 2014 14:39:41 GMT -5
Calling on the 3 days rule... Its been over 3 days since i got a reply and move from ryek.
|
|
|
Post by Ryek Marachion on Sept 7, 2014 15:19:05 GMT -5
The three days would work against you because your move is in question. Plus I wasn't made aware of the edit to your previous post. I will get a staff member to look at the post.
|
|
|
Post by Hugh Jackman on Sept 7, 2014 15:31:14 GMT -5
The edit was nothing. My move was still the same. I dont think my move is still in question because Keimaro used a card like that against you.
|
|
|
Post by Zeno on Sept 7, 2014 15:55:48 GMT -5
Ryek is correct. The effect is not a counter effect, so the activation was impossible due to the earlier prevention. Plus, the card shouldn't have been approved anyway since changing card attributes is my copyrighted effect. <_<
|
|
|
Post by Hugh Jackman on Sept 7, 2014 16:05:08 GMT -5
But Keimaro uses cards like that(the 1st effect) in situations like this frequently. Question: Do special counters have a different limit?
|
|
|
Post by Hugh Jackman on Sept 8, 2014 9:54:25 GMT -5
I believe this match should be a tie. I have a genuine reason. Ryek made me to believe that i could only counter his first move by using a special. I later asked Keimaro, and he said no. Assuming i didnt use a special at that time. I would have used Rapid Illusion. Thats my reason.
|
|
|
Post by Ryek Marachion on Sept 8, 2014 13:24:14 GMT -5
I believe this match should be a tie. I have a genuine reason. Ryek made me to believe that i could only counter his first move by using a special. I later asked Keimaro, and he said no. Assuming i didnt use a special at that time. I would have used Rapid Illusion. Thats my reason. That was your own ignorance. You can counter with either a special ability or a normal that negates the effect, but not with a " kind of counter, kind of not" move like what you were first trying to do. I do not believe theirs a tie here
|
|
|
Post by Hugh Jackman on Sept 8, 2014 13:33:12 GMT -5
I used a normal counter in the first place but you said it won't work. I won't call it ignorance on my part but on your part. You knew I was still new. Does giving out wrong rules sound legal? I don't think So.
|
|
|
Post by Ryek Marachion on Sept 8, 2014 22:34:03 GMT -5
Incorrect. The first thing you did was use the gate, which was rendered illegal if you don't have the gate, second you tried to use a ability that you were unable to play because it didnt actually negate my card to negate. Third, you played a card that actually was able to be played, but with the wrong name. Only on the fourth try did you actually do the right move. Now if you want to accuse me of anything, accuse me of winning this brawl because theirs no reason for the tie
|
|