L. Dusk: Heh, Saiki. I learned that quite a long time ago, and it doesn't help. I did, and Damian said he'd look at at it. Surprisingly enough, DG is the one who is the nucleus of this whole thing.
Oct 22, 2014 16:49:25 GMT -5
Seiki Maki: Huh? DG? But how? 0-0
Oct 22, 2014 18:58:47 GMT -5
L. Dusk: Because DG locked the thread when my opponent called a false 3 day rule.
Oct 22, 2014 20:06:24 GMT -5
L. Dusk: When it's quite obvious its a false 3 day rule. He called it after we had a discussion over the brawl itself.
Oct 22, 2014 20:08:49 GMT -5
L. Dusk: And I was told that it was called for a 3 day rule because I had not a modification in 3 days. Mind you they told me to make a modification beyond the 3 days, even whilst my modification was made before the discussion even came fourth. It's irritating.
Oct 22, 2014 20:10:09 GMT -5
L. Dusk: That's like someone asking you for something, and before they even asked you for it, you've already layed it out on their doorstep for them. Yet they still punish you for you not getting it to them, all because their inability to look down and see it.
Oct 22, 2014 20:11:28 GMT -5
Noland Hardy: I feel like the situation wasn't handled properly in terms of modifications, but I figured the three strike system was a more fair way of handling it.
Oct 22, 2014 20:29:48 GMT -5