|
Post by Zach Zeltroy on Nov 26, 2011 9:00:27 GMT -5
I think we should have a team ranking system. we should have a team tournament to decide the best team. For the tournament, each team has three representatives. After tournament, Ranks will be added (only top ten)
When you challenge another team for their rank, you must p.m. the leader. When fighting in a rank match, it must be three on three.
|
|
|
Post by Zack Hooklind on Nov 28, 2011 21:24:21 GMT -5
Well, we don't really have too many teams for start with, so a Team Ranking will be pretty useless and half of the actual team are inactive or have one member (the attempt of creating a team tournament is the proof
So yeah, I am not sure about this
|
|
|
Post by spectra phantom on Dec 22, 2011 5:16:21 GMT -5
We could reduce it to top five, here are the name of some active teams bbba,grimms,vestal,black council,soul takers all we need is five more teams
|
|
|
Post by Christy Vancent on Dec 31, 2011 12:52:24 GMT -5
First off, Zack is right.
The teams do very little, Houston's tournament is proof of that.
The odds any of them will actually participate in the rankings is actually very low.
|
|